6/30/09
Cesium, Nausea Tips, Ginger and More Info.
Ginger capsules or ginger root would possibly combat nausea.
r
Stomach upset and Nausea are quite common side effects from taking Cesium.
r
Link to Full Article Below.. but Note I do not Feel, as a non-doctor but someone passionate about
r
Doctors often suggest that people take up to 800 mg of a magnesium supplement while on the cesium protocol. A brief review of some possible signs of specific mineral deficiencies is included.
r
Research that Sorbitol is Healthy in ANY way..
6/12/09
"Chemotherapy and Radiation are Obviously NOT a Good Idea"
If you are going to recover from cancer, one of the first and most important things you need to learn is to distrust any "treatment" which concentrates on killing cancer cells. Why do I say that? Isn't that the objective of all of this palaver? Not really.
Treatments like chemotherapy and radiation are obviously not a good idea. They are extremely harsh on the rest of your body and they just don't work. But what about other treatments like: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Radio Frequency Ablation; Cytoluminescent Therapy; Smart Bomb Chemo; Rife Machines; etc., etc. What do these "sophisticated" treatments have in common?
They all concentrate on killing the cancer cells. Is that bad?
Well, yes -- really. Any treatment which works to kill most of the cancer cells in a tumor lulls the patient into a state of mind which says: " Boy, that's over! Now, I can get on with my life." Guess what?
In almost every case like this, the cancer recurs.
Usually in a more aggressive form. Why?
Because nothing has been done by either the medical professionals or the patient to correct the CAUSE.
They have concentrated all their attention on the SYMPTOM. But doesn't the cottage cheese/flaxseed oil treatment you tout so much kill cancer cells, Bill? Sure, but its main focus is on making your healthy cells healthier, just like the VIBE Machine.
And I don't ever recommend this as a solitary treatment. It should be part of a varied regimen to get your entire body back in balance. Remember always: Cancer is a "systemic" imbalance. It is caused by a non- functioning immune system. Cancer is not the tumor.
The tumor is just a symptom. Erasing the tumor (the visible part of the condition) does not erase the cancer.
Nobody can see cancer cells until they clump together by the billions in a tumor. So no doctor can ever say with certainty "We got it all." The "secret" to overcoming cancer is understanding that a permanent and usually radical change in lifestyle (food and supplements) is necessary.
There is no "short cut." Other prerequisites to recovery may include overcoming ongoing emotional stress or having root canal teeth removed. In any case, if your approach is not "systemic," you are wasting your time and money.
What do I mean by "systemic?" Simply that you must treat the body as a "system." All parts of it are related. Its cells and organs are communicating all the time. The treatment must be for the total "environment" of the body. Once the environment is hostile to cancer cells, they die and go away. If you continue the process that made the environment hostile to them, they stay away. This is a lifetime commitment. Your body has already told you it is susceptible to cancer. It is up to you to treat it in such a way that it stays "cancer-free."
Don't fall for the latest "gadgets" that promise to kill cancer cells. Adopt a regimen that works to rid you of the cancer and a commitment to continue it "for life." Get periodic testing (HCG Urine Test) to keep your mind free of concern. Then, get on with your life...because it will be long and prosperous.
Treatments like chemotherapy and radiation are obviously not a good idea. They are extremely harsh on the rest of your body and they just don't work. But what about other treatments like: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Radio Frequency Ablation; Cytoluminescent Therapy; Smart Bomb Chemo; Rife Machines; etc., etc. What do these "sophisticated" treatments have in common?
They all concentrate on killing the cancer cells. Is that bad?
Well, yes -- really. Any treatment which works to kill most of the cancer cells in a tumor lulls the patient into a state of mind which says: " Boy, that's over! Now, I can get on with my life." Guess what?
In almost every case like this, the cancer recurs.
Usually in a more aggressive form. Why?
Because nothing has been done by either the medical professionals or the patient to correct the CAUSE.
They have concentrated all their attention on the SYMPTOM. But doesn't the cottage cheese/flaxseed oil treatment you tout so much kill cancer cells, Bill? Sure, but its main focus is on making your healthy cells healthier, just like the VIBE Machine.
And I don't ever recommend this as a solitary treatment. It should be part of a varied regimen to get your entire body back in balance. Remember always: Cancer is a "systemic" imbalance. It is caused by a non- functioning immune system. Cancer is not the tumor.
The tumor is just a symptom. Erasing the tumor (the visible part of the condition) does not erase the cancer.
Nobody can see cancer cells until they clump together by the billions in a tumor. So no doctor can ever say with certainty "We got it all." The "secret" to overcoming cancer is understanding that a permanent and usually radical change in lifestyle (food and supplements) is necessary.
There is no "short cut." Other prerequisites to recovery may include overcoming ongoing emotional stress or having root canal teeth removed. In any case, if your approach is not "systemic," you are wasting your time and money.
What do I mean by "systemic?" Simply that you must treat the body as a "system." All parts of it are related. Its cells and organs are communicating all the time. The treatment must be for the total "environment" of the body. Once the environment is hostile to cancer cells, they die and go away. If you continue the process that made the environment hostile to them, they stay away. This is a lifetime commitment. Your body has already told you it is susceptible to cancer. It is up to you to treat it in such a way that it stays "cancer-free."
Don't fall for the latest "gadgets" that promise to kill cancer cells. Adopt a regimen that works to rid you of the cancer and a commitment to continue it "for life." Get periodic testing (HCG Urine Test) to keep your mind free of concern. Then, get on with your life...because it will be long and prosperous.
r
Labels:
Chemotherapy,
Radiation,
Ultrasound
The study found that vitamin C
The study found that vitamin C, one of conventional medicine’s banned vitamins, may actually sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs.
You read that right! It might actually make chemotherapy drugs more effective. In the study, patients took vitamin C along with the common chemotherapy drugs 5-FU and cisplatin.
The researchers found that vitamin C altered the DNA of the cancer, which made it more sensitive to chemotherapy. They also found that vitamin C actually improves the cancer-fighting ability of the drugs. I can’t tell you how many of my colleagues were severely harassed for suggesting that their patients take antioxidants as part of their cancer treatment.
When I lived in Anchorage, oncologists repeatedly condemned me for the same reason. I hope this new information, which was published in one of their respected journals, will change their minds on this. In my experience, I’ve seen vitamin C protect patients against the devastating effects of chemotherapy. I’ve even seen it make the chemo work better.
And I’ve found that it will help prevent many patients from losing their hair. If you or anyone you know is using chemotherapy, this is life-saving information. Make sure the oncologist sees this article. The cancer you kill, and the hair you save, might be your own.
Vitamin C enhances chemosensitization of esophageal cancer cells in vitro...
You read that right! It might actually make chemotherapy drugs more effective. In the study, patients took vitamin C along with the common chemotherapy drugs 5-FU and cisplatin.
The researchers found that vitamin C altered the DNA of the cancer, which made it more sensitive to chemotherapy. They also found that vitamin C actually improves the cancer-fighting ability of the drugs. I can’t tell you how many of my colleagues were severely harassed for suggesting that their patients take antioxidants as part of their cancer treatment.
When I lived in Anchorage, oncologists repeatedly condemned me for the same reason. I hope this new information, which was published in one of their respected journals, will change their minds on this. In my experience, I’ve seen vitamin C protect patients against the devastating effects of chemotherapy. I’ve even seen it make the chemo work better.
And I’ve found that it will help prevent many patients from losing their hair. If you or anyone you know is using chemotherapy, this is life-saving information. Make sure the oncologist sees this article. The cancer you kill, and the hair you save, might be your own.
Vitamin C enhances chemosensitization of esophageal cancer cells in vitro...
r
Labels:
Vitamin C and Cancer
One Cancer Solution - One Cancer Story - is anyone Truly Listening..
"Today I'd like to talk to you about my easy victory over my own (alleged)Stage 4 cancer. Maybe the best place to start with this would be to let you know that researchers at UCLA garnered lots of headlines two years ago because they had done something pretty incredible. (1)What had the UCLA researchers done?
They shrank tumors by 80% with the heat from habaneros peppers. That is quite extraordinary in terms of what is usually accomplished with toxic drugs. It's also worth noting that in the US the State of New Mexico has the lowest cancer mortality rate of all 50 states.
They probably eat more peppers in New Mexico per capita than all the other states, too. For several decades, modern medicine has tried a lot of toxic compounds, hoping to 'out-toxic' the cancer.And sure enough, the compounds did out-toxic cancer. Unfortunately, it usually out-toxics the patient as well.The result has been that cancer treatments are usually an expensive, painful and scary proposition.
But you already knew that. I didn't go bald or get sick to my stomach!
Fortunately, my Stage 4 cancer was none of the above for me. My advanced cancer treatment cost less than two tickets and popcorn at the movies.My treatment wasn't painful. And I wasn't scared...I didn't lose a minute's sleep...because I knew what to do.If we've learned anything about treating cancer in the last 50 to 60 years it has to be this:
As I emphatically told a woman in my store recently, "You gotta be healthy to get well!"
In my own case, I knew by the many lesions I had that I was already sick. I didn't need someone to help make me sicker. I needed to get healthy, so I could get well.In other words, the researchers at UCLA made a great choice in examining the anti-cancer properties of hot peppers.My own success in curing myself with habaneros peppers preceded the UCLA researchers by seven years.
And I didn't shrink my many tumors by 80%...I shrank them 100%.UCLA's research results did confirm that my own method was an extremely powerful weapon against cancer. I'm eternally grateful for their confirmation.But then, I used habaneros peppers PLUS two more low tech ingredients...running rings around the findings made by the UCLA guys and gals.(By the way, if you absolutely can't tolerate peppers, you can substitute freshly grated ginger...grated daily...not from a jar!)Research from the Universities of Michigan and Minnesota just scratch the surface of ginger's power against cancer.
Not only does ginger cause cancer cell death, it also makes the cancer cells turn on themselves. Speaking technically, that means the tumors go away. (2) (3) I Had Lesions From Top To Toe.
Well, almost. Let me start from the beginning. One morning as I was about to step into the shower, I noticed a couple of large round looking red splotches on my thigh and calf. They were about the size of a half dollar. I wasn't sure what to make of them, but they stood out like crazy.
By the next day, the two red lesions had turned brown. Only they were now accompanied by several more large red splotches. Some were on my upper back, lower back, hips, thighs and calves on both sides of my body. Within 24 hours, they turned brown, too. At this point, most people would probably have freaked out. I had a darn good reason not to, however.
I couple years earlier, I had written a book entitled The Doctor Who Cures Cancer. Gathering the research for the book gave me some critically important information that helped me to develop my own method.I figured, if what I had was cancer, that's not a problem because curing cancer isn't as difficult as we've been led to believe.
No, I wasn't pregnant! Many years earlier, I'd also learned that the common pregnancy tests sold in drug stores will sometimes produce a positive result if the person taking the test has cancer.
A call to the makers of one of the products confirmed that this is true: pregnancy screening tests can sometimes pick up the presence of cancer. It is well known among physicians that home pregnancy tests can show a false positive for pregnancy when the person being tested has cancer. The test isn't real accurate if the result is negative because the test kit requires that a high threshold be met before the test will read positive.
Pregnant women easily reach the threshold, but a person with cancer doesn't necessarily produce enough of the hormone to register on the test kit. But if the kit does show "positive" in a non-pregnant person, it is highly accurate for uncovering cancer.It seemed to me that it was worth a shot as a screening mechanism. Since I am a male, a positive test result would tell me what I needed to know. I did the test, and sure enough, the 'pregnancy' test result came up positive.
You might be wondering why a pregnancy test would read positive.I'm glad you asked. ;-) Pregnancy tests screen for the presence of a hormone called HCGH (human chorionic gonaditrophin hormone.) It's the same hormone that is elevated in cancer patients. But in most cases the level in cancer patients aren't high enough to trigger a positive test result. Down below will be listed information on a more sophisticated pregnancy test that's about 97% accurate for detecting cancer.
I'll tell you more about that test in a minute. Pregnancy kit 'says' I'm pregnant!In my case, my HCGH was high enough to score positive on the test. So there I was, a man, with more than a dozen large lesions AND a positive pregnancy test result! There was no point for me to go to a physician at that point, because (a) I had no insurance, and far more importantly, (b) chemo sucks in treating solid mass tumors, and I had more than a dozen visible tumors!
There's no telling how many tumors there might have been hidden within my body. Then there was reason (C) for not going to see a physician!!!
The first thing the doctor would have wanted to do would be to cut out a portion of one of the lesions to have it examined by a pathologist.
I had learned something profound when writing The Doctor Who Cures Cancer which was later confirmed in a book about Judah Folkman, M.D., (inventor of Angiostat) that the act of cutting out a portion of a tumor activates more tumors to sprout wings.
It seemed to me that there were too many tumors raging already to let anyone cut on me spurring further growth.Here's a real brief recipe list here.
(1) Grate one habaneros pepper each day, putting it on bread (2) Grate two cloves of garlic each day, putting them on bread (3) 1-2 Tablespoons of Emulsified cod liver oil each day.* TwinLabs makes some wonderfully flavored cod liver oil.I used the cod liver oil because I was not losing any weight or dealing with fluid retention.
If I had either of those conditions, I would have used evening primrose oil instead of the emulsified cod liver oil.(4)Smother the grated garlic and habaneros peppers with real butter and eat it. No margarines of any type, including Smart Balance, etc.That's it!
The potent active ingredients from the peppers and the garlic disperse quickly. So they must be grated each day, and eaten immediately. You're probably thinking, whoa that's gotta be hot! Yes, it is. And it will make you breathe deeply! That's a good thing, because heavy breathing pumps the lymph system. As you know, cancer cells often gather there.
What I did was put the habaneros and the garlic on one side of the bread and folded it over.
Plus, it's handy to have another half slice at the ready to cut the burning sensation in my mouth. So let yourself breathe deeply for a minute or two and then eat the extra half slice of bread. Let me say a word or two about the bread.
I used Ezekiel spouted bread. You can get it in the freezer section of health food stores and at Publix. Yes, it costs about $5.00. But keep in mind that all the ingredients together won't cost you more than $20. Can you use another bread? Maybe. Or maybe not.
It is what I used, and I don't like to mess with the success I had.How well did this recipe of mine work? All of my lesions went away in about four or five days.
I had a dozen or more, so that was pretty good, if you ask me. Since I wasn't fond of the peppers and garlic (LOL!) I quit after the fifth or sixth day. A few days later, three or four lesions came back. So I went back on the three part recipe. The lesions vanished once again in about four days. After that, I continued to take the emulsified cod liver oil for about six months. On occasion I take another bottle of the cod liver oil.
And I take fish oil sporadically.T his episode of my (alleged)raging cancer took place around October of 1998 as best that I can recall. No lesion has returned since that time. It's working for others, too!
Here's a comment given below from a woman who has tried my cure for two weeks:"
I wanted to make sure and report back to you after having followed your protocol for two weeks.
I am SO PLEASED to say that the (stabbing, knife piercing) pains in my right breast are completely gone, and so is the lump!"
When you look at the possibility of being cancer free in two weeks, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain. This works. it really works. You can pick up 2/3's of your cure at the grocery store. In the first part of this two-part article
I mentioned that researchers from UCLA used peppers to shrink tumors 80%. Here's something to keep in mind about that. The researchers don't have a patent on peppers or garlic.
The peppers are available at many grocery stores. Garlic is available at every grocery store in the United States, and probably the world over. The point I'm making is that you have access to these ingredients, and you don't need a lab coat or a university degree to buy them. Here's the info on the more sophisticated HCGH test: The sophisticated test was developed by a Philippine Dr. Manuel D. Navarro in the late 1950's!
His son, Dr. Efren Navarro, continues to analyze the test results. The test is called the "HCG Urine Immunoassay." This HCG test can find cancer 12 to 27 months before other kinds of testing depending on the type of cancer.When i checked into this two years ago, the test cost about $50. To find out more, call Erlinda Suarez at (847) 359-3634.The address is 631 Peregrine Dr., Palatine, IL 60067.
Please be aware that the turn around time for the test is about six weeks. So that test is better used to discover cancer before you think you have it. The best to you. Kelley Eidem UPDATE: Here are some exciting comments posted below from two cancer patients who tried my recipe.
It looks like they might be curing themselves!
#1 - "I wanted to make sure and report back to you after having followed your protocol for two weeks. I am SO PLEASED to say that the (stabbing, knife piercing) pains in my right breast are completely gone, and so is the lump! Kelley, this is so exciting for me! God bless you and thank you, thank you!"#2 - "I was diagnosed with Stage 3 colorectal cancer (June 31) and a 10 inch (25cm) tumor. I felt terrible (painfully tired, bloody stool, flatulence, etc.). I submitted to 3 days of chemo and 13 out of 28 radiation treatments before I stopped."
I don't know what the tumor is doing, but for the last three days I have been eating the buttered bread with habaneros pepper tincture. For the last seven days I have been using a sodiuim bicarbonate enema as well." Since starting the pepper bread I have never felt better, at least not in many months.
The fatigue and pain are gone. I also started to crave the pepper bread. I was also taking 10 adjuvant food supplements a Harvard oncologist had recommended specifically for colorectal cancer, but I never felt really good until the pepper bread.
"There is a definite positive difference from the pepper bread that no other food, supplement, or treatment gave me. I will be continuing it indefinitely." The best to you. Kelley Eidem Together we can cure cancer - one person at a time!"
They shrank tumors by 80% with the heat from habaneros peppers. That is quite extraordinary in terms of what is usually accomplished with toxic drugs. It's also worth noting that in the US the State of New Mexico has the lowest cancer mortality rate of all 50 states.
They probably eat more peppers in New Mexico per capita than all the other states, too. For several decades, modern medicine has tried a lot of toxic compounds, hoping to 'out-toxic' the cancer.And sure enough, the compounds did out-toxic cancer. Unfortunately, it usually out-toxics the patient as well.The result has been that cancer treatments are usually an expensive, painful and scary proposition.
But you already knew that. I didn't go bald or get sick to my stomach!
Fortunately, my Stage 4 cancer was none of the above for me. My advanced cancer treatment cost less than two tickets and popcorn at the movies.My treatment wasn't painful. And I wasn't scared...I didn't lose a minute's sleep...because I knew what to do.If we've learned anything about treating cancer in the last 50 to 60 years it has to be this:
half killing the patient isn't half way successful.
As I emphatically told a woman in my store recently, "You gotta be healthy to get well!"
In my own case, I knew by the many lesions I had that I was already sick. I didn't need someone to help make me sicker. I needed to get healthy, so I could get well.In other words, the researchers at UCLA made a great choice in examining the anti-cancer properties of hot peppers.My own success in curing myself with habaneros peppers preceded the UCLA researchers by seven years.
And I didn't shrink my many tumors by 80%...I shrank them 100%.UCLA's research results did confirm that my own method was an extremely powerful weapon against cancer. I'm eternally grateful for their confirmation.But then, I used habaneros peppers PLUS two more low tech ingredients...running rings around the findings made by the UCLA guys and gals.(By the way, if you absolutely can't tolerate peppers, you can substitute freshly grated ginger...grated daily...not from a jar!)Research from the Universities of Michigan and Minnesota just scratch the surface of ginger's power against cancer.
Not only does ginger cause cancer cell death, it also makes the cancer cells turn on themselves. Speaking technically, that means the tumors go away. (2) (3) I Had Lesions From Top To Toe.
Well, almost. Let me start from the beginning. One morning as I was about to step into the shower, I noticed a couple of large round looking red splotches on my thigh and calf. They were about the size of a half dollar. I wasn't sure what to make of them, but they stood out like crazy.
By the next day, the two red lesions had turned brown. Only they were now accompanied by several more large red splotches. Some were on my upper back, lower back, hips, thighs and calves on both sides of my body. Within 24 hours, they turned brown, too. At this point, most people would probably have freaked out. I had a darn good reason not to, however.
I couple years earlier, I had written a book entitled The Doctor Who Cures Cancer. Gathering the research for the book gave me some critically important information that helped me to develop my own method.I figured, if what I had was cancer, that's not a problem because curing cancer isn't as difficult as we've been led to believe.
No, I wasn't pregnant! Many years earlier, I'd also learned that the common pregnancy tests sold in drug stores will sometimes produce a positive result if the person taking the test has cancer.
A call to the makers of one of the products confirmed that this is true: pregnancy screening tests can sometimes pick up the presence of cancer. It is well known among physicians that home pregnancy tests can show a false positive for pregnancy when the person being tested has cancer. The test isn't real accurate if the result is negative because the test kit requires that a high threshold be met before the test will read positive.
Pregnant women easily reach the threshold, but a person with cancer doesn't necessarily produce enough of the hormone to register on the test kit. But if the kit does show "positive" in a non-pregnant person, it is highly accurate for uncovering cancer.It seemed to me that it was worth a shot as a screening mechanism. Since I am a male, a positive test result would tell me what I needed to know. I did the test, and sure enough, the 'pregnancy' test result came up positive.
You might be wondering why a pregnancy test would read positive.I'm glad you asked. ;-) Pregnancy tests screen for the presence of a hormone called HCGH (human chorionic gonaditrophin hormone.) It's the same hormone that is elevated in cancer patients. But in most cases the level in cancer patients aren't high enough to trigger a positive test result. Down below will be listed information on a more sophisticated pregnancy test that's about 97% accurate for detecting cancer.
I'll tell you more about that test in a minute. Pregnancy kit 'says' I'm pregnant!In my case, my HCGH was high enough to score positive on the test. So there I was, a man, with more than a dozen large lesions AND a positive pregnancy test result! There was no point for me to go to a physician at that point, because (a) I had no insurance, and far more importantly, (b) chemo sucks in treating solid mass tumors, and I had more than a dozen visible tumors!
There's no telling how many tumors there might have been hidden within my body. Then there was reason (C) for not going to see a physician!!!
The first thing the doctor would have wanted to do would be to cut out a portion of one of the lesions to have it examined by a pathologist.
I had learned something profound when writing The Doctor Who Cures Cancer which was later confirmed in a book about Judah Folkman, M.D., (inventor of Angiostat) that the act of cutting out a portion of a tumor activates more tumors to sprout wings.
It seemed to me that there were too many tumors raging already to let anyone cut on me spurring further growth.Here's a real brief recipe list here.
(1) Grate one habaneros pepper each day, putting it on bread (2) Grate two cloves of garlic each day, putting them on bread (3) 1-2 Tablespoons of Emulsified cod liver oil each day.* TwinLabs makes some wonderfully flavored cod liver oil.I used the cod liver oil because I was not losing any weight or dealing with fluid retention.
If I had either of those conditions, I would have used evening primrose oil instead of the emulsified cod liver oil.(4)Smother the grated garlic and habaneros peppers with real butter and eat it. No margarines of any type, including Smart Balance, etc.That's it!
The potent active ingredients from the peppers and the garlic disperse quickly. So they must be grated each day, and eaten immediately. You're probably thinking, whoa that's gotta be hot! Yes, it is. And it will make you breathe deeply! That's a good thing, because heavy breathing pumps the lymph system. As you know, cancer cells often gather there.
What I did was put the habaneros and the garlic on one side of the bread and folded it over.
Plus, it's handy to have another half slice at the ready to cut the burning sensation in my mouth. So let yourself breathe deeply for a minute or two and then eat the extra half slice of bread. Let me say a word or two about the bread.
I used Ezekiel spouted bread. You can get it in the freezer section of health food stores and at Publix. Yes, it costs about $5.00. But keep in mind that all the ingredients together won't cost you more than $20. Can you use another bread? Maybe. Or maybe not.
It is what I used, and I don't like to mess with the success I had.How well did this recipe of mine work? All of my lesions went away in about four or five days.
I had a dozen or more, so that was pretty good, if you ask me. Since I wasn't fond of the peppers and garlic (LOL!) I quit after the fifth or sixth day. A few days later, three or four lesions came back. So I went back on the three part recipe. The lesions vanished once again in about four days. After that, I continued to take the emulsified cod liver oil for about six months. On occasion I take another bottle of the cod liver oil.
And I take fish oil sporadically.T his episode of my (alleged)raging cancer took place around October of 1998 as best that I can recall. No lesion has returned since that time. It's working for others, too!
Here's a comment given below from a woman who has tried my cure for two weeks:"
I wanted to make sure and report back to you after having followed your protocol for two weeks.
I am SO PLEASED to say that the (stabbing, knife piercing) pains in my right breast are completely gone, and so is the lump!"
When you look at the possibility of being cancer free in two weeks, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain. This works. it really works. You can pick up 2/3's of your cure at the grocery store. In the first part of this two-part article
I mentioned that researchers from UCLA used peppers to shrink tumors 80%. Here's something to keep in mind about that. The researchers don't have a patent on peppers or garlic.
The peppers are available at many grocery stores. Garlic is available at every grocery store in the United States, and probably the world over. The point I'm making is that you have access to these ingredients, and you don't need a lab coat or a university degree to buy them. Here's the info on the more sophisticated HCGH test: The sophisticated test was developed by a Philippine Dr. Manuel D. Navarro in the late 1950's!
His son, Dr. Efren Navarro, continues to analyze the test results. The test is called the "HCG Urine Immunoassay." This HCG test can find cancer 12 to 27 months before other kinds of testing depending on the type of cancer.When i checked into this two years ago, the test cost about $50. To find out more, call Erlinda Suarez at (847) 359-3634.The address is 631 Peregrine Dr., Palatine, IL 60067.
Please be aware that the turn around time for the test is about six weeks. So that test is better used to discover cancer before you think you have it. The best to you. Kelley Eidem UPDATE: Here are some exciting comments posted below from two cancer patients who tried my recipe.
It looks like they might be curing themselves!
#1 - "I wanted to make sure and report back to you after having followed your protocol for two weeks. I am SO PLEASED to say that the (stabbing, knife piercing) pains in my right breast are completely gone, and so is the lump! Kelley, this is so exciting for me! God bless you and thank you, thank you!"#2 - "I was diagnosed with Stage 3 colorectal cancer (June 31) and a 10 inch (25cm) tumor. I felt terrible (painfully tired, bloody stool, flatulence, etc.). I submitted to 3 days of chemo and 13 out of 28 radiation treatments before I stopped."
I don't know what the tumor is doing, but for the last three days I have been eating the buttered bread with habaneros pepper tincture. For the last seven days I have been using a sodiuim bicarbonate enema as well." Since starting the pepper bread I have never felt better, at least not in many months.
The fatigue and pain are gone. I also started to crave the pepper bread. I was also taking 10 adjuvant food supplements a Harvard oncologist had recommended specifically for colorectal cancer, but I never felt really good until the pepper bread.
"There is a definite positive difference from the pepper bread that no other food, supplement, or treatment gave me. I will be continuing it indefinitely." The best to you. Kelley Eidem Together we can cure cancer - one person at a time!"
Link to Source, Click Below
r
Labels:
Cancer Diet,
Cancer Tests,
Cod Liver Oil,
Garlic,
Navarro Test,
Peppers,
Stories
Navarro - Urine Test - Early Cancer Detection - NO Mammograms..

Many say that Mammograms CAUSE Cancer. So if there are lots of better ways, why keep forcing Mammograms on woman and guilting them in to getting one. Insurance does not cover Alternative Non-Mutaliting Cancer (Solutions) - which I am not allowed to Call Cures.
The HGC Immuno Assay Cancer Test
Detect Cancer Early, the Test has been around for decades and your not allowed to know about it why. Why is your body Their Way to Make Big Money and Control You.
A safe, cost-effective, non-invasive, accurate screening for Cancer
Developed in the late 1930's by the renowned oncologist, the late Dr. Manuel D. Navarro, the test detects the presence of HCG* in urine. It indicates the presence of cancer cells even before signs or symptoms develop. Dr. Navarro found HCG to be elevated in all types of cancers.
The test is based on a theory proposed by Dr. Howard Beard and other researchers who contend that cancer is related to a misplaced trophoblast cell that becomes malignant in a manner similar to pregnancy in that they both secrete HCG.
As a consequence, a measure of the amount of HCG found in the blood or urine is also a measure of the degree of malignancy. The higher the number, the greater the severity of the cancer.
Urine, as opposed to blood or serum, is the preferred specimen for the test. In 1980, Papapetrou and co-authors reported the correctness of the urine specimen to be used in HCG Immunoassay. In 32 proven cancer cases, the immunoassay test gave 31 positive results using urine while only 12 positive results were reported using blood. HCG has been found to undergo glycosylation in the liver as it travels in the hepatic circulation. Thus, the HCG molecule cannot be detected. The molecule does not undergo this process in the kidney and therefore the molecule remains intact in the urine.
The test detects the presence of brain cancer as early as 29 months before symptoms appear; 27 months for fibrosarcoma of the abdomen; 24 months for skin cancer; 12 months for cancer of the bones (metastasis from breast cancer extirpated 2 years earlier).
Currently, many cancer patients take advantage of the diagnostic accuracy of this test as an indicator of the effectiveness of their specific mode of therapy. Patients follow a simple direction for preparing a dry extract from the urine sample. The powdery extract is mailed to the Navarro Medical Clinic where the HCG testing is performed.
The test is based on a theory proposed by Dr. Howard Beard and other researchers who contend that cancer is related to a misplaced trophoblast cell that becomes malignant in a manner similar to pregnancy in that they both secrete HCG.
As a consequence, a measure of the amount of HCG found in the blood or urine is also a measure of the degree of malignancy. The higher the number, the greater the severity of the cancer.
Urine, as opposed to blood or serum, is the preferred specimen for the test. In 1980, Papapetrou and co-authors reported the correctness of the urine specimen to be used in HCG Immunoassay. In 32 proven cancer cases, the immunoassay test gave 31 positive results using urine while only 12 positive results were reported using blood. HCG has been found to undergo glycosylation in the liver as it travels in the hepatic circulation. Thus, the HCG molecule cannot be detected. The molecule does not undergo this process in the kidney and therefore the molecule remains intact in the urine.
The test detects the presence of brain cancer as early as 29 months before symptoms appear; 27 months for fibrosarcoma of the abdomen; 24 months for skin cancer; 12 months for cancer of the bones (metastasis from breast cancer extirpated 2 years earlier).
Currently, many cancer patients take advantage of the diagnostic accuracy of this test as an indicator of the effectiveness of their specific mode of therapy. Patients follow a simple direction for preparing a dry extract from the urine sample. The powdery extract is mailed to the Navarro Medical Clinic where the HCG testing is performed.
r
r
Labels:
Cancer Detection,
Cancer Screening,
Cancer Tests,
Navarro Test
Take Charge of Your Cancer - Your Health - You Can Do this...
The medical profession is running a scam upon the population and anything they claim to be new and/or whatever, too often turns out to be another smokescreen.
Professor John Beard published his findings 100 years ago, and to this day, no one has been able to refute his thesis. Cancer tumors and trophoblasts are one in the same, and thus, both emit hCG. The hCG titre is used in the form of blood tests and urine excretions to determine the estimated amounts of tumors in the body, and it is these figures that oncologists use to state that cancer levels rise or fall. The levels are total nonsense, of course, because the applied treatments do nothing to eradicate the disease which always returns unless the pH of the body fluids are normalized. Should the public ever come to understand this, the treatment of cancer, as it is applied today, will be exposed for what it is, a scam. Cancer is a disease of civilization.
It develops because Progenitor Cryptocides pleomorphically evolves into BX & BY mycoplasmas which Drs. Rife and Kendall proved when they created cancer in a test tube along with other diseases by simply altering the growth media and observing the results 36 hours later. Dr. Rife stated this action clearly in the Crane tapes surrendered by Dr. Stafford to the Kinneman Foundation.Everybody believes that detecting cancer early has some great benefit in curing the disease. It does not. Nor does it make any difference as to which stage one begins to treat it correctly. Extirpation only exacerbates the condition, causing it to return with a vengeance. One is better off leaving it alone.
This is especially true with breast cancer, which is an off-shoot of uterine epithelial cells contaminated with chemicals produced in combination with environmental toxins along with excessive estrogens and autointoxication due to inadequate elimination of the waste products of cellular metabolism, coupled with missing essential minerals. Otto Warburg was awarded the 1931 Noble Prize in 'Physiology in Medicine' for his discovery of this metabolic mechanism.
* Also a lack of elemental Iodine. Simple measures such as eating at least 4 Brazil nuts for Selenium daily and taking a couple of drops of Lugols with a healthy dose of Vitamin C and B vitamins should go far in preventative measures then mainstream testing palliatives... Chris Gupta It matters not wether you detect cancer with any test because the treatments offered by allopathic medicine is only palliative. They do not address the cause of the disease.
Amputation of the appendages is NEVER REQUIRED but continues to be practiced because surgical remedies are incredibly lucrative. Tumors dissolve on their own if the necessary digestive enzymes are permitted to perform their primary function without the distraction of having to divert their powers for the emaciation of excessive animal proteins. Cancer, like diabetes, is a disease of the fork and spoon. People don't 'catch' this disease, they earn it through inadequate nutrition and improper hygiene
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/
2006/08/15/the_myth_of_early_cancer_detection.htm
r
Professor John Beard published his findings 100 years ago, and to this day, no one has been able to refute his thesis. Cancer tumors and trophoblasts are one in the same, and thus, both emit hCG. The hCG titre is used in the form of blood tests and urine excretions to determine the estimated amounts of tumors in the body, and it is these figures that oncologists use to state that cancer levels rise or fall. The levels are total nonsense, of course, because the applied treatments do nothing to eradicate the disease which always returns unless the pH of the body fluids are normalized. Should the public ever come to understand this, the treatment of cancer, as it is applied today, will be exposed for what it is, a scam. Cancer is a disease of civilization.
It develops because Progenitor Cryptocides pleomorphically evolves into BX & BY mycoplasmas which Drs. Rife and Kendall proved when they created cancer in a test tube along with other diseases by simply altering the growth media and observing the results 36 hours later. Dr. Rife stated this action clearly in the Crane tapes surrendered by Dr. Stafford to the Kinneman Foundation.Everybody believes that detecting cancer early has some great benefit in curing the disease. It does not. Nor does it make any difference as to which stage one begins to treat it correctly. Extirpation only exacerbates the condition, causing it to return with a vengeance. One is better off leaving it alone.
This is especially true with breast cancer, which is an off-shoot of uterine epithelial cells contaminated with chemicals produced in combination with environmental toxins along with excessive estrogens and autointoxication due to inadequate elimination of the waste products of cellular metabolism, coupled with missing essential minerals. Otto Warburg was awarded the 1931 Noble Prize in 'Physiology in Medicine' for his discovery of this metabolic mechanism.
* Also a lack of elemental Iodine. Simple measures such as eating at least 4 Brazil nuts for Selenium daily and taking a couple of drops of Lugols with a healthy dose of Vitamin C and B vitamins should go far in preventative measures then mainstream testing palliatives... Chris Gupta It matters not wether you detect cancer with any test because the treatments offered by allopathic medicine is only palliative. They do not address the cause of the disease.
Amputation of the appendages is NEVER REQUIRED but continues to be practiced because surgical remedies are incredibly lucrative. Tumors dissolve on their own if the necessary digestive enzymes are permitted to perform their primary function without the distraction of having to divert their powers for the emaciation of excessive animal proteins. Cancer, like diabetes, is a disease of the fork and spoon. People don't 'catch' this disease, they earn it through inadequate nutrition and improper hygiene
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/
2006/08/15/the_myth_of_early_cancer_detection.htm
r
Labels:
Iodine,
Otto Warburg
Blood test finds breast cancer at its earliest stage
A new blood test that detects breast cancer at its earliest stage could become a vital weapon in fighting the disease.
Scientists found the test could pinpoint cancer long before it would show up using other methods.
They believe it could be adapted to identify ovarian and prostate cancers as well.
Trial results showed it was up to 1,000 times more sensitive than existing tests.
The results could have far-reaching implications for diagnosis of the disease, which claims up to 400,000 lives a year worldwide.
Breast cancer is the most common female cancer, with 1.1million new cases each year.
In Britain, more than 40,000 women are diagnosed annually, with more than 12,400 deaths.
Doctors currently use a combination of breast examination, imaging with mammography and ultrasonography, and biopsy to diagnose the condition.
But researchers recently claimed such scans could actually trigger the disease in some women.
Cancer specialists found radiation from the X-rays leaves those with a family history of breast cancer more than 50 per cent more likely to develop it.
They said the risk was highest for young women and those repeatedly given X-rays.
This means a more effective screening method is needed, especially for the rarer cases involving younger women. The new blood test offers the best hope.
It works by detecting subtle changes in proteins in the bloodstream, caused when the immune system starts to fight a cancer.
The test may also help identify whether a tumour is malignant or benign, ensuring the best treatment can be quickly selected. Early detection of cancer gives the best chance of effective treatment. The five-year survival rate can be as high as 97 per cent if the disease has not spread.
Professor Jasminka Godovac-Zimmerman, from University College London, reports the findings in the Journal of Proteome Research today.
She led the group which included scientists from the Universities of Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh and the U.S.company BioTraces Inc, based in Herndon, Virginia.
"Our pilot studies show that using blood samples, breast cancer and several other types of epithelial cancers (ovarian, prostate, melanoma) can be detected with much better sensitivity and specificity," she said.
She said this may allow new, less intrusive, safer and much less expensive approaches for the early diagnosis of cancer.
It would also help in distinguishing malignant and benign tumours and in monitoring cancer therapy.
Stephen Duffy, Cancer Research UK's professor of screening, said further trials are needed before the test can be used by doctors.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/
article-399033/Blood-test-finds-breast-cancer-earliest-stage.html
r
The More You Know ...
r
Scientists found the test could pinpoint cancer long before it would show up using other methods.
They believe it could be adapted to identify ovarian and prostate cancers as well.
Trial results showed it was up to 1,000 times more sensitive than existing tests.
The results could have far-reaching implications for diagnosis of the disease, which claims up to 400,000 lives a year worldwide.
Breast cancer is the most common female cancer, with 1.1million new cases each year.
In Britain, more than 40,000 women are diagnosed annually, with more than 12,400 deaths.
Doctors currently use a combination of breast examination, imaging with mammography and ultrasonography, and biopsy to diagnose the condition.
But researchers recently claimed such scans could actually trigger the disease in some women.
Cancer specialists found radiation from the X-rays leaves those with a family history of breast cancer more than 50 per cent more likely to develop it.
They said the risk was highest for young women and those repeatedly given X-rays.
This means a more effective screening method is needed, especially for the rarer cases involving younger women. The new blood test offers the best hope.
It works by detecting subtle changes in proteins in the bloodstream, caused when the immune system starts to fight a cancer.
The test may also help identify whether a tumour is malignant or benign, ensuring the best treatment can be quickly selected. Early detection of cancer gives the best chance of effective treatment. The five-year survival rate can be as high as 97 per cent if the disease has not spread.
Professor Jasminka Godovac-Zimmerman, from University College London, reports the findings in the Journal of Proteome Research today.
She led the group which included scientists from the Universities of Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh and the U.S.company BioTraces Inc, based in Herndon, Virginia.
"Our pilot studies show that using blood samples, breast cancer and several other types of epithelial cancers (ovarian, prostate, melanoma) can be detected with much better sensitivity and specificity," she said.
She said this may allow new, less intrusive, safer and much less expensive approaches for the early diagnosis of cancer.
It would also help in distinguishing malignant and benign tumours and in monitoring cancer therapy.
Stephen Duffy, Cancer Research UK's professor of screening, said further trials are needed before the test can be used by doctors.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/
article-399033/Blood-test-finds-breast-cancer-earliest-stage.html
r
The More You Know ...
r
The Myth of Early Cancer Detection
"It matters not wether you detect cancer with any test because the treatments offered by allopathic medicine is only palliative. They do not address the cause of the disease. Amputation of the appendages is NEVER REQUIRED but continues to be practiced because surgical remedies are incredibly lucrative.
Tumors dissolve on their own if the necessary digestive enzymes are permitted to perform their primary function without the distraction of having to divert their powers for the emaciation of excessive animal proteins.
Cancer, like diabetes, is a disease of the fork and spoon. People don't 'catch' this disease, they earn it through inadequate nutrition and improper hygiene. Early detection is moot! Absolutely no one needs to die from this totally curable disease!"
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/
2006/08/15/the_myth_of_early_cancer_detection.htm
r
Tumors dissolve on their own if the necessary digestive enzymes are permitted to perform their primary function without the distraction of having to divert their powers for the emaciation of excessive animal proteins.
Cancer, like diabetes, is a disease of the fork and spoon. People don't 'catch' this disease, they earn it through inadequate nutrition and improper hygiene. Early detection is moot! Absolutely no one needs to die from this totally curable disease!"
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/
2006/08/15/the_myth_of_early_cancer_detection.htm
r
Labels:
Cancer Detection,
Cancer Tests
5/28/09
"The High pH Therapy for Cancer Tests on Mice and Humans"
Steps Leading to the Formation of Cancer Cells:
1. Glucose can still enter the cell, but oxygen cannot. The cell thus becomes anaerobic.
2. In the absence of oxygen, the glucose undergoes fermentation to lactic acid. The cell pH then drops to 7 and finally down to 6.5.
3. In the acid medium the DNA loses its positive and negative radical sequence. In addition, the amino acids entering the cell are changed. As a consequence, the RNA is changed and the cell completely loses its control mechanism. Chromosomal aberrations may occur.
4. In the acid medium the various cell enzymes are completely changed into very toxic compounds. These toxins kill the cells in the main body of the tumor mass. A tumor therefore consists of a thin layer of rapidly growing cells surrounding the dead mass. The acid toxins leak out from the tumor mass and poison the host. They thus give rise to the pains generally associated with cancer.
Mass spectrographic and isotope studies have shown that potassium, rubidium, and especially cesium are most efficiently taken up by cancer cells. This uptake was enhanced by Vitamins A and C as well as salts of zinc and selenium. The quantity of cesium taken up was sufficient to raise the cell to the 8 pH range, where cell mitosis ceases and the life of the cell is short. Tests on mice fed cesium and rubidium showed marked shrinkage in the tumor masses within 2 weeks. In addition, the mice showed none of the side effects of cancer. Tests have been carried out on over 30 humans. In each case the tumor masses disappeared.
Also all pains and effects associated with cancer disappeared within 12 to 36 hours. The more chemotherapy and morphine the patient had taken, the longer the withdrawal period. Studies of the food intake in areas where the incidences of cancer are very low showed that it met the requirements for the high pH therapy.
Cesium, rubidium and potassium cations (positively charged ions) are all strong electron receptors which can be attracted into the membrane because of the negative potential gradient which exists across all living membranes. Elements below potassium in the Electromotive Series, like calcium, are only taken up sparingly, if at all, by cancer cells. Therefore potassium, which transports glucose, can readily enter cancer cells, but Calcium, which transports oxygen, cannot. Warburg pointed out this anearobic state of cancer cells in 1925. In the normal cell the glucose, upon entering the cell, reacts with the oxygen in the cell and is burned to carbon dioxide and water with the liberation of heat.
This heat in turn is absorbed on the membrane surface and raises it to an energized state which permits it to attach more Ca++ ions. Thus it will be seen that the amount of oxygen entering the cell is determined by oxidation within the cell, primarily that of glucose. This action is responsible for the pH control mechanism of the cell which maintains a value near 7.35.
The ready uptake of cesium and rubidium by the cancer cells lead the writer to the High pH therapy. This consists of feeding the patient close to 6 g of Cesium Chloride or Rubidium Chloride per day . It is sufficient however to give rise to the pH in the cancer cells, bringing them up in a few days to the 8 or above where the life of the cell is short. In addition, the presence of Cesium and Rubidium salts in the body fluids neutralizes the acid toxins leaking out of the tumor mass and renders them nontoxic.
In tests on mice, tumors implanted where significantly smaller at the end of the test in mice fed Rubidium than the controls. In addition, the test animals were showing none of the adverse effects of having cancer. Similar experiments with cesium chloride had similar successful results. Many tests on humans have been carried out by H. Nieper in Hannover, Germany and by H. Sartori in Washington, DC. It has been observed that all pains associated with cancer disappear within 12 to 24 hours. In these tests 2 gram doses of Cesium Chloride were administered three times per day after eating. In most cases 5 to 10 grams of Vitamin C and 100,000 units of Vitamin A, along with 50 to 100 mg of zinc, were also administered. Both Nieper and Sartori were also administering nitrilosides in the form of laetrile.
There are good reasons to believe that the laetrile may be more effective than the vitamins in enhancing the pickup of cesium by the cells. In addition to the loss of pains, the physical results are a rapid shrinkage of the tumor masses. The material comprising the tumors is secreted as uric acid in the urine; the uric acid content of the urine increases many fold. About 50% of the patients were pronounced terminal, and were not able to work. Of these, a majority have gone back to work. Two side effects have been observed in some of the patients. These are first nausea, and the second diarrhea. Both depend upon the general condition of the digestive tract.
There are a number of areas where the incidences of cancer are very low. At the 1978 Stockholm Conference on Food and Cancer it was concluded that there is definitely a connection between the two.
The Hopi Indians of Arizona have a very low incidence of cancer: 1 in 1000 as compared to 1 in 4 for the USA as a whole. Analysis of their diet shows that it meets the requirements for the high pH therapy. Hopi food is very high in potassium and exceptionally high in rubidium. Since the soil is volcanic it must also be very rich in cesium.
Some 20 years ago the incidence of cancer among the Pueblo Indians was the same as that for the Hopi Indians, but they have adopted a modern American diet and now have the same cancer rate as the rest of the US. Supermarket foods is essentially lacking rubidium and cesium and low in potassium.
Cancer is virtually unknow among the Hunza of North Pakistan and their diet also meets the requirements of the High pH therapy. They are essentially vegetarians, and are great fruit eaters, eating ordinarily 40 apricots per day; they always eat the kernels, either directly or as a meal. They drink at least 4 liters of mineral spring waters which abound in the area and has been found to be very rich in cesium. Since the soil is volcanic in nature, it must be concluded that it will be rich in Cesium and Rubidium, as well as Potassium.
The Indians of Central America and on the highland of Peru and Equador also have very low incidences of cancer. The soil in these areas is volcanic with fruit in the area very high in rubidium and cesium. Cases have been reliably reported where people with advance inoperable cancer have gone to live with these Indians, and found that all tumor masses disappear within a very few months. Clearly the food there meets the high pH requirements.
Cesium and Rubidium salts, when present in the adjacent fluids, the pH of cancer cells will rise to the point where the life of the cell is short, and that they will also neutralize the acid toxins formed in the tumor mass and render them nontoxic.
In later writing, Dr. Brewer wrote: "The goal of the high pH therapy is the transport of large quantities of Cs+ Rb+ and glucose-free K+ across the membranes of cancer cells. During high pH therapy, Dr. H. Nieper, M.D., observed a loss of potassium which should be replaced." Two booklets discussing Dr. Brewer's final theories about cesium are available from the Brewer Science Library: "High pH Cancer Therapy with Cesium," and "Cancer Its Nature and a Proposed Treatment," both by A. Keith Brewer, Ph.D.
Information Sources:
http://www.mwt.net/~drbrewer/highpH.htm
1. Glucose can still enter the cell, but oxygen cannot. The cell thus becomes anaerobic.
2. In the absence of oxygen, the glucose undergoes fermentation to lactic acid. The cell pH then drops to 7 and finally down to 6.5.
3. In the acid medium the DNA loses its positive and negative radical sequence. In addition, the amino acids entering the cell are changed. As a consequence, the RNA is changed and the cell completely loses its control mechanism. Chromosomal aberrations may occur.
4. In the acid medium the various cell enzymes are completely changed into very toxic compounds. These toxins kill the cells in the main body of the tumor mass. A tumor therefore consists of a thin layer of rapidly growing cells surrounding the dead mass. The acid toxins leak out from the tumor mass and poison the host. They thus give rise to the pains generally associated with cancer.
Mass spectrographic and isotope studies have shown that potassium, rubidium, and especially cesium are most efficiently taken up by cancer cells. This uptake was enhanced by Vitamins A and C as well as salts of zinc and selenium. The quantity of cesium taken up was sufficient to raise the cell to the 8 pH range, where cell mitosis ceases and the life of the cell is short. Tests on mice fed cesium and rubidium showed marked shrinkage in the tumor masses within 2 weeks. In addition, the mice showed none of the side effects of cancer. Tests have been carried out on over 30 humans. In each case the tumor masses disappeared.
Also all pains and effects associated with cancer disappeared within 12 to 36 hours. The more chemotherapy and morphine the patient had taken, the longer the withdrawal period. Studies of the food intake in areas where the incidences of cancer are very low showed that it met the requirements for the high pH therapy.
Cesium, rubidium and potassium cations (positively charged ions) are all strong electron receptors which can be attracted into the membrane because of the negative potential gradient which exists across all living membranes. Elements below potassium in the Electromotive Series, like calcium, are only taken up sparingly, if at all, by cancer cells. Therefore potassium, which transports glucose, can readily enter cancer cells, but Calcium, which transports oxygen, cannot. Warburg pointed out this anearobic state of cancer cells in 1925. In the normal cell the glucose, upon entering the cell, reacts with the oxygen in the cell and is burned to carbon dioxide and water with the liberation of heat.
This heat in turn is absorbed on the membrane surface and raises it to an energized state which permits it to attach more Ca++ ions. Thus it will be seen that the amount of oxygen entering the cell is determined by oxidation within the cell, primarily that of glucose. This action is responsible for the pH control mechanism of the cell which maintains a value near 7.35.
The ready uptake of cesium and rubidium by the cancer cells lead the writer to the High pH therapy. This consists of feeding the patient close to 6 g of Cesium Chloride or Rubidium Chloride per day . It is sufficient however to give rise to the pH in the cancer cells, bringing them up in a few days to the 8 or above where the life of the cell is short. In addition, the presence of Cesium and Rubidium salts in the body fluids neutralizes the acid toxins leaking out of the tumor mass and renders them nontoxic.
In tests on mice, tumors implanted where significantly smaller at the end of the test in mice fed Rubidium than the controls. In addition, the test animals were showing none of the adverse effects of having cancer. Similar experiments with cesium chloride had similar successful results. Many tests on humans have been carried out by H. Nieper in Hannover, Germany and by H. Sartori in Washington, DC. It has been observed that all pains associated with cancer disappear within 12 to 24 hours. In these tests 2 gram doses of Cesium Chloride were administered three times per day after eating. In most cases 5 to 10 grams of Vitamin C and 100,000 units of Vitamin A, along with 50 to 100 mg of zinc, were also administered. Both Nieper and Sartori were also administering nitrilosides in the form of laetrile.
There are good reasons to believe that the laetrile may be more effective than the vitamins in enhancing the pickup of cesium by the cells. In addition to the loss of pains, the physical results are a rapid shrinkage of the tumor masses. The material comprising the tumors is secreted as uric acid in the urine; the uric acid content of the urine increases many fold. About 50% of the patients were pronounced terminal, and were not able to work. Of these, a majority have gone back to work. Two side effects have been observed in some of the patients. These are first nausea, and the second diarrhea. Both depend upon the general condition of the digestive tract.
There are a number of areas where the incidences of cancer are very low. At the 1978 Stockholm Conference on Food and Cancer it was concluded that there is definitely a connection between the two.
The Hopi Indians of Arizona have a very low incidence of cancer: 1 in 1000 as compared to 1 in 4 for the USA as a whole. Analysis of their diet shows that it meets the requirements for the high pH therapy. Hopi food is very high in potassium and exceptionally high in rubidium. Since the soil is volcanic it must also be very rich in cesium.
Some 20 years ago the incidence of cancer among the Pueblo Indians was the same as that for the Hopi Indians, but they have adopted a modern American diet and now have the same cancer rate as the rest of the US. Supermarket foods is essentially lacking rubidium and cesium and low in potassium.
Cancer is virtually unknow among the Hunza of North Pakistan and their diet also meets the requirements of the High pH therapy. They are essentially vegetarians, and are great fruit eaters, eating ordinarily 40 apricots per day; they always eat the kernels, either directly or as a meal. They drink at least 4 liters of mineral spring waters which abound in the area and has been found to be very rich in cesium. Since the soil is volcanic in nature, it must be concluded that it will be rich in Cesium and Rubidium, as well as Potassium.
The Indians of Central America and on the highland of Peru and Equador also have very low incidences of cancer. The soil in these areas is volcanic with fruit in the area very high in rubidium and cesium. Cases have been reliably reported where people with advance inoperable cancer have gone to live with these Indians, and found that all tumor masses disappear within a very few months. Clearly the food there meets the high pH requirements.
Cesium and Rubidium salts, when present in the adjacent fluids, the pH of cancer cells will rise to the point where the life of the cell is short, and that they will also neutralize the acid toxins formed in the tumor mass and render them nontoxic.
In later writing, Dr. Brewer wrote: "The goal of the high pH therapy is the transport of large quantities of Cs+ Rb+ and glucose-free K+ across the membranes of cancer cells. During high pH therapy, Dr. H. Nieper, M.D., observed a loss of potassium which should be replaced." Two booklets discussing Dr. Brewer's final theories about cesium are available from the Brewer Science Library: "High pH Cancer Therapy with Cesium," and "Cancer Its Nature and a Proposed Treatment," both by A. Keith Brewer, Ph.D.
Information Sources:
http://www.mwt.net/~drbrewer/highpH.htm
Labels:
Alkaline Therapy,
Keith Brewer
Alert - Mammograms Cause Cancer
Here's some food for thought: Dr. Irwin Bross was director of biostatistics at Roswell Park Memorial Institute in Buffalo, New York. In the 1970s, Dr. Bross headed a project that studied the alarming increase in rates of leukemia. It was called the Tri-State Leukemia Study. His sample used tumor registries from 16 million people from New York, Maryland, and Minnesota.
After checking factors as diverse as health history, occupational history, residential history, family background, cause of death for parents and grandparents, exposure to farm animals, pet ownership, whether or not the pets had ever been sick, Dr. Bross came to the conclusion that the main cause of the rising rates of leukemia was medical radiation in the form of diagnostic medical X-rays (Leslie Freeman, ed., Nuclear Witnesses: Insiders Speak Out, New York: Norton, 1982, p. 27).Dr. John Gofman, Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California at Berkeley, was wondering the same thing in the early 1990s.
His research led him to write a 400-page book in which he estimates that "three-quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." Astonishingly, this isn't even news. "[M]edical science," Gofman continues, "has known for 20 years that ionizing radiation is a prominent and proven cause of breast-cancer" (John Gofman, Preventing Breast Cancer, San Francisco: Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, 1995, p. 303).
http://www.gentlebirth.org/nwnm.org/Article_for_The_Union.htm
Note the size of the study. It was no small sampling. Note the words "prominent and proven." Not surprisingly, Dr. Bross lost his funding from the National Cancer Institute when his study was published in the respected American Journal of Public Health.
This despite the fact the Dr. Bross is an eminent researcher who has held prestigious positions at major medical centers including Roswell Park and John Hopkins. From Reclaiming our Health by John Robbins, p. 233-234(which also cites the above study): In the early 1960's, working for the Atomic Energy Commission, John Gofman established the Biomedical Research Division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, for the purpose of evaluating the health effects of all types of nuclear activities.
There, he came to the distressing conclusion that human exposure to ionizing radiation was far more serious than had been previously recognized. Dr. Gofman's work led to his 1995 book Preventing Breast Cancer, in which he came to a stunning conclusion: "Our estimate is that about three quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." John Gofman does not underestimate the role played in cancer causation played by pesticides, hormone pills, fatty diets, and other environmental stressors.
He states: "There is no inherent conflict or competition between carcinogens," because they multiply each other's carcinogenic effects. But he finds the medical use of radiation to be so crucial that it bears repeating: "An estimated 75 per cent of recent and current breat cancer cases would not have occurred as they did, in the absence of earlier medical[and other] irradiation."
Although ionizing radiation, the type delivered by X-rays and radiotherapy, is one of the few environmental contaminants known unequivocally to cause many forms of cancer, it is routinely recommended for many cancer patients. This, despite the fact that,with few exceptions, there is no proven benefit to survival."
After checking factors as diverse as health history, occupational history, residential history, family background, cause of death for parents and grandparents, exposure to farm animals, pet ownership, whether or not the pets had ever been sick, Dr. Bross came to the conclusion that the main cause of the rising rates of leukemia was medical radiation in the form of diagnostic medical X-rays (Leslie Freeman, ed., Nuclear Witnesses: Insiders Speak Out, New York: Norton, 1982, p. 27).Dr. John Gofman, Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California at Berkeley, was wondering the same thing in the early 1990s.
His research led him to write a 400-page book in which he estimates that "three-quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." Astonishingly, this isn't even news. "[M]edical science," Gofman continues, "has known for 20 years that ionizing radiation is a prominent and proven cause of breast-cancer" (John Gofman, Preventing Breast Cancer, San Francisco: Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, 1995, p. 303).
http://www.gentlebirth.org/nwnm.org/Article_for_The_Union.htm
Note the size of the study. It was no small sampling. Note the words "prominent and proven." Not surprisingly, Dr. Bross lost his funding from the National Cancer Institute when his study was published in the respected American Journal of Public Health.
This despite the fact the Dr. Bross is an eminent researcher who has held prestigious positions at major medical centers including Roswell Park and John Hopkins. From Reclaiming our Health by John Robbins, p. 233-234(which also cites the above study): In the early 1960's, working for the Atomic Energy Commission, John Gofman established the Biomedical Research Division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, for the purpose of evaluating the health effects of all types of nuclear activities.
There, he came to the distressing conclusion that human exposure to ionizing radiation was far more serious than had been previously recognized. Dr. Gofman's work led to his 1995 book Preventing Breast Cancer, in which he came to a stunning conclusion: "Our estimate is that about three quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." John Gofman does not underestimate the role played in cancer causation played by pesticides, hormone pills, fatty diets, and other environmental stressors.
He states: "There is no inherent conflict or competition between carcinogens," because they multiply each other's carcinogenic effects. But he finds the medical use of radiation to be so crucial that it bears repeating: "An estimated 75 per cent of recent and current breat cancer cases would not have occurred as they did, in the absence of earlier medical[and other] irradiation."
Although ionizing radiation, the type delivered by X-rays and radiotherapy, is one of the few environmental contaminants known unequivocally to cause many forms of cancer, it is routinely recommended for many cancer patients. This, despite the fact that,with few exceptions, there is no proven benefit to survival."
Link to Source and More...
r
Mammography Radiation - I Believe that Mammograms Cause Cancer - Do Your homework
Breast Cancer Rates Soar after Mammograms
(NaturalNews) A report just published in the Journal of the American Medical Association's Archives of Internal Medicine reaches a startling conclusion. Breast cancer rates increased significantly in four Norwegian counties after women there began getting mammograms every two years.
In fact, according to background information in the study, the start of screening mammography programs throughout Europe has been associated with increased incidence of breast cancer.
This raises some obvious and worrisome questions: Did the x-rays and/or the sometimes torturous compression of breasts during mammography actually spur cancer to develop? Or does this just look like an increase in the disease rate because mammography is simply identifying more cases of breast cancer? The answer to the first question is that no one knows (and it isn't addressed in the Archives of Internal Medicine study). But the second question has an unexpected and – for those interested in the human body's innate ability to heal itself – potentially paradigm-shifting answer.
The researchers say they can't blame the increased incidence of breast cancer on more cases being found because the rates among regularly screened women remained higher than rates among women of the same age who only received mammograms once after six years. Bottom line: the scientists conclude this indicates that some of the cancers detected by mammography would have spontaneously regressed if they had never been discovered on a mammogram and treated, usually with chemotherapy and radiation. Simply put, it appears that some invasive breast cancers simply go away on their own, healed by the body's own immune system.
The researchers were surprised to find that the incidence of invasive breast cancer was 22 percent higher in the group regularly screened with mammography. In fact, screened women were more likely to have breast cancer at every age.
"Because the cumulative incidence among controls never reached that of the screened group, it appears that some breast cancers detected by repeated mammographic screening would not persist to be detectable by a single mammogram at the end of six years," the authors stated in their report. "This raises the possibility that the natural course of some screen-detected invasive breast cancers is to spontaneously regress."
The researchers also conclude that their findings "provide new insight on what is arguably the major harm associated with mammographic screening, namely, the detection and treatment of cancers that would otherwise regress." This does not mean breast cancer should be ignored or not treated. After all, breast cancer is the second leading cause of death among American women.
But the extraordinarily good and hopeful news is that it appears invasive breast cancer sometimes can be destroyed naturally -- at least in some people -- by the body's own innate defenses." Although many clinicians may be skeptical of the idea, the excess incidence associated with repeated mammography demands that spontaneous regression be considered carefully," the scientists wrote in their report. "Spontaneous regression of invasive breast cancer has been reported, with a recent literature review identifying 32 reported cases. This is a relatively small number given such a common disease.
However, as some observers have pointed out, the fact that documented observations are rare does not mean that regression rarely occurs. It may instead reflect the fact that these cancers are rarely allowed to follow their natural course."
Read Full Article Click Below
KILL CANCER CELLS
Cancer is characterized by proliferation of abnormal cells which multiply out of control, destroying healthy tissue and endangering life. This unchecked "cancerous" growth spreads throughout the body, interfering with the ability of cells, organs, and other structures to perform their normal functions.
various internet sources detailing the life and death of cancer cells.
Check Out
various internet sources detailing the life and death of cancer cells.
Check Out
r
Of Course this is Information Only and Not to Be deemed as Medical Advice... only Doctors can do that...
r
5/27/09
Dr. Donsbach speaking at the Health Freedom Expo in Long Beach
Dr. Donsbach speaking at the Health Freedom Expo in Long Beach California on April 4, 2009. Dr. Donsbach prophetically warns about government persecution of practitioners of Alternative Medicine. Five days later Dr. Donsbach was arrested by San Diego Police on grounds that he was practicing medicine without a license.
Who Owns Your Body.... What Rights Do you Really Have...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
